![]() |
Innovation for Improved Practice (evidence-based health care) |
||||||||
|
|||||||||
| Ask a question about this product Tweet |
|||||||||
![]() |
You need to Login in order to add this resource to your library | ||||||||
Chapter 4: Innovation for Improved Practice This Chapter discusses how by 2002 information overload and nihilism had become a very real problem for all types of practitioners. The Institute recognised that it was not enough to provide resources and technology for researchers; clinicians and students also needed these facilities. As the evidence-based approach gathered momentum and the volume of information intensified, it was clear that clinicians also needed to understand how to evaluate the quality of evidence. The evidence-based movement was dictating that practice be supported by evidence; a new skill base was required within the industry that would break down the barriers between science (research) and applied science (practice). Critical appraisal was becoming a vital component of health care practice if clinicians were to become more effective decision makers in practice.
Zoe Jordan Pauline Donnelly Pauline is a registered nurse with extensive experience in health services delivery, management and public administration. She has a Bachelor of Nursing degree and a Master of Health Administration degree and main areas of practice have been in community health and aged care in the United Kingdom; she also spent a number of years working in remote areas of Papua New Guinea. Most recently Pauline has worked for the Australian Government in the areas of aged care, rural health and primary health care until her recent retirement to pursue other interests. Elizabeth Pittman |
|||||||||
Professional Reviews:There are yet no reviews for this resource. Please log in to write a review. |
|||||||||


